Amanda Noronha in a black blouse, with her hand resting on her chin, studio portrait
Mentoring

Individual cycle

How the decision changes hands over the cycle

At the start, the review weighs more. By the end, you are the one who prioritizes and defends the decision, with your own criteria.

  • Mentoring support
  • Your own criteria
Esquema sem escala: o apoio da mentoria diminui e o critério próprio cresce do começo ao fim do ciclo, e as duas linhas se cruzam no meio.
Start

The agenda is your case: your site, your meeting, your decision next week.

Middle

A task between one session and the next, and a review of what you applied before it becomes a decision.

End

Criteria to prioritize and defend the choice in front of leadership, after the mentoring ends.

Illustrative diagram, not to scale.

Criterion Individual Group
Agenda Your case Cases from the group
Pace Three-month cycle Length of the group
Between sessions Your task, reviewed Exercise and Q&A session
Best for A specific, urgent decision Repertoire and a method foundation

In consulting, I do the diagnosis and deliver the prioritized list. In mentoring, you do it, and I review, point out what was left out and discuss the order. Consulting fixes the site. Mentoring builds the criteria of whoever will keep fixing it after I leave.

The price goes in the proposal, after the initial conversation. It changes with the format, individual or group, and with the length of the cycle. In the conversation I tell you which format fits where you are now and send in writing what is included and what stays out.

No. Mentoring is for analysts, coordinators and leaders in SEO, content and product. What changes is the agenda.

With a thirty-minute conversation, at no cost, so I can understand where you are and tell you which of the two formats fits. If neither fits, I will say so right away.

Next step